Study summary

Study Summary: Performance Indicators in Speed Climbing (Hosseini et al., 2023)

Methods, findings, limitations and practical meaning of the 2023 paper combining Speed literature, competition video analysis and expert interviews.

SpeedClimbing.com Editorial TeamReviewed August 19, 2026Direct Speed Evidence — synthesis
Direct Speed Evidence — synthesis

This page summarizes one paper. Findings should be interpreted within its design, sample and limitations.

StudyPerformance indicators in speed climbing: insights from the literature supplemented by a video analysis and expert interviews
Year2023
DesignReview + video analysis + expert interviews
Evidence labelDirect Speed Evidence — synthesis

Research question and overview

This paper was designed specifically to identify physical and tactical factors associated with peak Speed performance. It combined existing Speed literature with competition video analysis and expert perspectives.

Methods

The authors reviewed relevant literature, analyzed high-level competition video and incorporated expert interviews. This mixed approach is useful when a sport's formal research base is still small, although the components do not all carry the same evidentiary weight.

Main findings

The paper highlighted lower-limb power, movement fluency, coordinated motion, correct foot movement, reaction/start factors and other physical characteristics as relevant to performance. Its central practical message is that power must be converted through motor control and route execution.

Limitations

The review was constrained by the number and scale of Speed-specific studies available. Expert interviews provide domain knowledge but are not randomized evidence, and associations should not be treated as proof of causation.

Practical meaning

This is one of the best orientation papers for the site because it explains why Training is multi-factor and why Technique emphasizes accuracy, sequence and fluency.

Read the original paper

Performance indicators in speed climbing: insights from the literature supplemented by a video analysis and expert interviews. The original paper is authoritative for exact methods, statistics and author conclusions.

Evidence Map · Performance determinants · Bibliography

SC

Summary standard

Each summary separates what was studied, how it was measured, what was found, what limits the conclusion and what the result can reasonably mean in practice.