Movement analysis

Speed Climbing Movement, Phase and Time-Motion Research

Research that breaks a Speed climb into phases, contacts, errors and movement patterns to show where performance differences emerge.

SpeedClimbing.com Editorial TeamEvidence reviewed August 19, 2026Research & evidence center

Evidence summary

Time-motion analysis makes a Speed run more informative than one final time. Researchers have divided the route into phases, measured reaction and errors, and more recently used large video datasets to examine elite movement patterns at scale.

Direct Speed Evidence — moderate and growing

Video-based evidence is one of the strongest Speed-specific research areas because the standardized route permits repeated comparisons.

Why divide the climb into phases?

A final time says who was faster but not where time was gained. Phase analysis can reveal whether a performance difference appears near the start, through acceleration, in a specific route section or at the finish.

Errors are performance variables

A slip or missed contact can dominate a short race. Reliability therefore belongs inside performance analysis rather than being treated as noise.

From hundreds to roughly 900 videos

A 2022 World Cup analysis used 384 performances. A 2025 study expanded the scale to roughly 900 competition recordings using computer-vision methods.

Computer vision opportunity

Automated keypoint detection can scale movement analysis beyond manual coding. It is promising, but algorithmic estimates still require validation and careful interpretation.

Why this matters for the site

Technique pages can increasingly link movement claims to evidence rather than relying only on descriptive coaching language.

Sources used for this page

Evidence is summarized, not reproduced. Follow the original paper for exact methods, statistics, limitations and author conclusions.

Continue in the evidence center

See the Evidence Map, Research Bibliography and individual study summaries.

SC

Research-summary policy

We separate direct Speed evidence from broader climbing evidence, describe study design and limitations, and avoid converting associations into causal training claims.